Huntsville Police identify fallen veteran officer

NASA’s next Mars rover will make oxygen, look for farmland

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.
Data pix.

(CNN) -- For 17 years, NASA rovers have laid down tire tracks on Mars. But details the space agency divulged this week about its next Martian exploration vehicle underscored NASA's ultimate goal.

Footprints are to follow someday.

The last three rovers -- Spirit, Opportunity and Curiosity -- confirmed the Red Planet's ability to support life and searched for signs of past life.

The Mars rover of the next decade will hone in on ways to sustain future life there, human life.

"The 2020 rover will help answer questions about the Martian environment that astronauts will face and test technologies they need before landing on, exploring and returning from the Red Planet," said NASA's William Gerstenmaier who works on human missions.

This will include experiments that convert carbon dioxide in the Martian atmosphere into oxygen "for human respiration."

Oxygen could also be used on Mars in making rocket fuel that would allow astronauts to refill their tanks.

Twin rovers

The 2020 rover is the near spitting image of Curiosity and NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory announced plans to launch the new edition not long after Curiosity landed on Mars in 2012.

But the 2020 rover has new and improved features. The Mars Oxygen ISRU Experiment, or MOXIE for short, is just one.

There are super cameras that will send back 3D panoramic images and spectrometers that will analyze the chemical makeup of minerals with an apparent eye to farming.

"An ability to live off the Martian land would transform future exploration of the planet," NASA said in a statement.

The 2020 rover will also create a job for a future mission to complete, once the technology emerges to return to Earth from Mars. It will collect soil samples to be sent back for lab analysis at NASA.

Mars since 1964

In the 1960s, the public focus on NASA centered on missions to the moon. Neil Armstrong, who took his "one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind" 45 years ago, was the first human to set foot on a celestial body.

But by then, the space agency had already sent a satellite to Mars -- the first in 1964. In 1976, the first two landers, Viking 1 and 2, touched down on its surface. The first rover, Pathfinder, began rolling around 20 years later.

In 2016, NASA plans to send a new stationary lander, InSight, to Mars to drop a probe into the ground and research the planet's core. It's currently undergoing testing.

The future mission to bring back soil samples collected by the Mars 2020 rover is to be robotic.

It's not clear when Earthlings can look forward to the next small step for a human that's a giant leap for humankind.


  • hannodb

    FINALLY! A rover mission that will not be chasing fantasies of past life of Mars, but will do research that is actually USEFUL. Not that the first 3 rovers didn’t make exciting discoveries, but we can discover so much more when we focus on what Mars IS or COULD BECOME, rather than what we hope it was. (And don’t tell me “100% of places where we found liquid water, we found life!” That’s a stupid wishful statement, based on a planetary sample size of ONE! Just because liquid water is necessary for live, doesn’t make it SUFFICIENT for life)

    While they’re busy, I hope they send some hardy fungus and bacteria as well, to see how they survive. Enough of this “planetary ethics” nonsense. There is no ethical responsibility towards a world that is – and always was – dead.

  • Nuclear Mike

    Anyone would know that all the basic minerals are present on Mars…”farmland” is a public relations ploy to keep the Public wanting to spend tax dollars on NASA where the manned mission to Mars is a lethal voyage of death by cosmic radiation to humans…and will not happen in any of our lifetimes.

    • hannodb

      “and will not happen in any of our lifetimes.” Probably not, but the sooner we begin with missions focused on colonization, the sooner we can go. I would imagine that we would need to create a self sustaining robotic colony long before we can send humans anyway. Lot’s of things needs to happen before we can go, but if we start now, our children will reap the benefits.

      Mars One is an international pyramid scheme targeting the gullible and idealistic, and will never get off the ground.

Comments are closed.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.