For Rolling Stone, ‘worst nightmare’ continues

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

(Photo courtesy: MGN)

RICHMOND, Va. (AP) _ Jurors who found that Rolling Stone magazine defamed a University of Virginia administrator in a botched story about a rape at a fraternity house will now decide how much money to award her.

The 10-person jury concluded Friday that Rolling Stone magazine, its publisher and a reporter were responsible for libel, with actual malice, with the now-discredited 2014 story “A Rape on Campus.”

The jury’s decision comes at a time when the public’s distrust of the press runs deep and is the latest in a year that brought large judgments against other media outlets.

Eramo was seeking $7.5 million from her lawsuit. Jurors are expected to return to court next week to decide how much to award her.