EPA Proposes New Regulations Aimed at Cutting Carbon Emissions

EPA400

(CNN) — President Barack Obama is using his executive authority to take his strongest action yet against climate change — proposing new EPA regulations.

The chief of the Environmental Protection Agency will announce a proposal Monday that would require power plants to cut their carbon emissions by 30% by 2030, a source briefed on the matter told CNN.

States will have a variety of options to meet the goal, the source said.

Those include improving energy efficiency both inside and outside the plants, changing how long the plants operate each day, and increasing the amount of power derived in other ways through clean energy, the source said.

Some Republicans aren’t happy, saying the requirement will kill jobs in the coal industry. But the White House says it’s not just good for the environment, it will also be healthier.

“As president, and as a parent, I refuse to condemn our children to a planet that’s beyond fixing,” Obama said in his weekly address Saturday.

“Being able to act to regulate the emissions of carbon will create profound benefits for the health of our children,” White House spokesman Jay Carney told CNN’s “New Day” on Monday, citing a spike in asthma among children that needs to be curbed. “It also creates huge benefits when it comes to enhancing our energy security and creating opportunities — entrepreneurial opportunities.”

Asked about criticism that the move won’t make much difference globally without India and China doing the same, Carney said, “The United States has to lead, first of all, and this is an indication that the United States will lead on this very important challenged posed by climate change and global warming.”

The costs

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, a business federation, estimated the new regulations will cost the economy $50 billion a year.

“The administration has set out to kill coal and its 800,000 jobs,” Sen. Mike Enzi said in the GOP weekly address Saturday. “If it succeeds in death by regulation, we’ll all be paying a lot more money for electricity — if we can get it.”

But environmental advocates say such claims are exaggerated.

“This is something we can’t put off, and the President deserves huge credit for making this his legacy,” said David Doniger of the Natural Resources Defense Council.

Carney wrote off job loss claims as a “doomsday scenario. That’s what they said when regulation was put in place in 1990 over acid rain. And it wasn’t true then.”

Political impact

New EPA regulations could affect competitive Senate races in states with a significant coal industry, such as Kentucky, North Carolina and Colorado, where Democrats are trying to keep control of the upper chamber.

According to The New York Times, the proposed regulations take aim at the nation’s more than 600 coal-fired power plants.

Under the proposed regulation, states will be given a wide menu of options to achieve the carbon emission cuts, according to the Times.

Instead of shutting down coal plants immediately, states would be allowed to cut emissions by making changes across their electricity systems — such as by installing new wind and solar generation or energy-efficiency technology, the Times reported.

Carney said last week that the president’s proposal isn’t just about the environment and health; it’s also about making the country more energy independent.

TM & © 2014 Cable News Network, Inc., a Time Warner Company. All rights reserved.

3 comments

  • Branko Pezdi

    So now the alleged manmade global warming is causing asthma in kids.

    Liberals find new ways to be idiots every single day.

  • Nuclear Mike

    If you are prepared to accept this nonsense, then be prepared to have your electric power bill escalate at several times the annual inflation rate for the next 10+years…beginning next year here with the TVA service area!

  • Nuclear Mike

    For those of you who voted in a man as POTUS whose buddies put together the Carbon Exchange XX Bank in Chicago…you are about to pay with your jobs and electric bills too expensive for many more to be able to pay in the next few years…his use of the EPA Clean Air Act is absurd as he is trying to make his last years of executive powers a nightmare that will follow for many many many years as the Carbon Exchange rakes in the $billions$ for his shares held in trust.

Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 967 other followers